W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > December 2000

Re: summary of 'a triple is not unique' and 'statements/reified' statements

From: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>
Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2000 10:15:47 -0800
Message-ID: <3A2A8DD3.A82A59ED@robustai.net>
To: Graham Klyne <GK@Dial.pipex.com>
CC: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>, www-rdf-interest@w3c.org
Graham Klyne wrote:

> At 02:46 PM 11/28/00 +0000, Libby Miller wrote:
>
> >http://ilrt.org/discovery/2000/11/statements/
>
> If one document or context makes an assertion about the statement [r], and
> some other document makes a different assertion using the same URI for [r],
> then they are assertions about the *same* stating, even though the
> reification is invoked in very different places.
>
> >However, when a reified statement is given a URI via the ID attribute then
> >this implies that any reified statement with that URI is referring to
> >the same stating.
>
> Yes.

Yes.

topic: Implications of using the statement id
see: http://ilrt.org/discovery/2000/11/statements/#3.1
text:  However, when a reified statement is given a URI via the ID attribute then
this implies that any reified statement with that URI is referring to the same
stating.

So is this registering somewhere as a consensus?  Is there any dissent?

Seth Russell
Received on Sunday, 3 December 2000 13:13:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:47 GMT