- From: Graham Klyne <GK@Dial.pipex.com>
- Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2000 10:05:13 +0000
- To: Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN <champin@bat710.univ-lyon1.fr>
- Cc: ML RDF-interest <www-rdf-interest@w3c.org>
At 01:37 PM 12/2/00 +0100, Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN wrote: >Still investigating issues about reification... > >Are, in your opinion, the following RDF piece, equivalent ?? In my opinion (not supported by the specs) I think they should be. That is, reification implied by an rdf:id= on a property being equivalent to explicit construction of the reification. I don't think the spec says anything about the meaning of rdf:id= on a property element. #g -- >Example 1: > ><rdf:Description about="#d1" xmlns:my="http://schemas.org/"> > <my:prop rdf:id="s1"> Foo </my:prop> ></rdf:Description> ><rdf:Description about="#s1"/> > <my:prop> Bar </my:prop/> ></rdf:Description> > > >Example 2: > ><rdf:Description about="#d1" xmlns:my="http://schemas.org/"> > <my:prop> Foo </my:prop> ></rdf:Description> ><rdf:Statement id="s1"> > <rdf:subject resource="#d1"/> > <rdf:predicate resource="http://schemas.org/prop"/> > <rdf:object> Foo </rdf:object> ></rdf:Statement> ><rdf:Description about="#s1"/> > <my:prop> Bar </my:prop/> ></rdf:Description> > > Pierre-Antoine ------------ Graham Klyne (GK@ACM.ORG)
Received on Sunday, 3 December 2000 12:15:03 UTC