W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > August 2000

Schema typos?

From: McBride, Brian <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2000 13:35:56 +0100
Message-ID: <5E13A1874524D411A876006008CD059FE7D8A0@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
The last element of the document at http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema

<rdf:Description about="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#">
  <rdfs:seeAlso resource="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema-more"/>

Should that be

<rdf:Description about="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#">
  <rdfs:seeAlso rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema-more"/>

The element defining isDefinedBy reads:

<rdf:Property ID="isDefinedBy">
  <rdf:type resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#Property"/>
  <rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="#seeAlso"/>
  <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">isDefinedBy</rdfs:label>
  <rdfs:label xml:lang="fr">esD&#233;finiPar</rdfs:label>
  <rdfs:comment>Indicates a resource containing and defining the subject
  <rdfs:range rdf:resource="#Resource"/>
  <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#Resource"/>

Is there a reason for the redundant rdf:type property on
the second line.  The elements defining ConstraintResource,
predicate, Literal and label have similar redundant rdf:type

Fooled me when I was checking parser output by counting the number
of statements there should be.

Brian McBride
Received on Sunday, 27 August 2000 08:36:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:07:31 UTC