Wouldn't it make it easier to make a clear rule for this? The convention could be: 1. The RDF Resource (NOT all URIs) can always be separated into the 'model' and the 'name'. 2. The name part will be the part after the last of a demarcation character. In order, look for '#', '/', ':' and ''. (Is the empty URI legal?) 3. The model will be the first part of the string including the demarcation model. 4. The model represents a collection of statements from the authority owning that part of the URI space. 5. Official statements about the URI will either be included in this model or referenced from it (ie seeAlso). 6. If the URI is a property or a class, the model will include a schema or refere to a schema, defining this resource. 7. Other models can extend a schema or say anything they like about a resource. 8. The model may be retrivable, as specified by the protocol, but doesn't have to be. -- / Jonas - http://jonas.liljegren.org/myself/en/index.htmlReceived on Friday, 11 August 2000 06:51:35 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:43 GMT