W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > August 2000

Re: [Fwd: xmlns, uri+name pairs or just uris..? Clarification needed.]

From: Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN <champin@bat710.univ-lyon1.fr>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 09:29:31 +0200
Message-ID: <3993AB5B.A650B76C@bat710.univ-lyon1.fr>
To: "McBride, Brian" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
CC: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
"McBride, Brian" wrote:
> In that case I would be troubled about what the URI Ref that
> names a property actually names.  Does it name the property
> or does it name the document/document fragment that describes
> the property.  The foundation of the web is that URI's denote
> one resource;

That is exactly the point, IMO :
the document/document fragment describing a property is *not* the property, and they should not be mandated to have the same URI (though I admit this is a very practical way of naming properties...)


--- Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur
    Whatever is said in Latin sounds important.
Received on Friday, 11 August 2000 03:19:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:07:31 UTC