On Mon, 7 Aug 2000, McBride, Brian wrote: > > The ability to store class definitions (for example) in an > > RDF model is appealing. > > Could you say a little more about what you have in mind here? > > I did consider having a mapping from RDF types to Java classes > that implement those types so that whenever a resource 'got' > an object of the correct Java class would be instantiated. > > I haven't done that because I don't think the RDF and Java > type models are sufficiently similar, e.g. if a resource has > two types, which one do I instantiate. This is exactly what I have done with WRAF. And this is whay I say "strange OO" in the (very) short presentation: http://www.uxn.nu/wraf/ The goal is like skipping several generations of RDF applications and going for the "ultimate" thing. :-) Since I'm just today actualy have a working (bare bones) pre alfa version, I would like to tell a little more about this thing. Hold on. will now write somthing up and send it as a separate email. :-) -- / Jonas - http://jonas.liljegren.org/myself/en/index.htmlReceived on Monday, 7 August 2000 13:45:58 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:43 GMT