W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > April 2000

Re: TR: Re: Constraining Containers - erratum

From: Pierre-Antoine Champin <champin@bat710.univ-lyon1.fr>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 15:54:39 +0200
Message-ID: <3905A39F.4010804@bat710.univ-lyon1.fr>
To: Jonas Liljegren <jonas@paranormal.se>
CC: RDF Intrest Group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Jonas Liljegren wrote:

> > I would rather type
> > <dc:Author> Pierre-Antoine </dc:Author>
> > than
> > <dc:Author> <rdf:Seq> <rdf:li> Pierre-Antoine </rdf:li> </rdf:Seq> 
> > </dc:Author>
> It IS legal and ok to have repeated properties:
> <Description about="book">
>   <dc:Author>Pierre-Antoine </dc:Author>
>   <dc:Author>Jonas</dc:Author>
> </Description>

> It's ok if the property is designed to be used either as a repeated
> property or with a container. The two variations are not exactly
> equvivalent.
> In your example with the Seq, you don't say that you are a author. It is
> the SEQUENCE that is the author. You happen to be a member of that
> Sequence, but that doesn't make you an author.
that's still right - you convinced me
ok for

<rdf:Property ID="myprop">
     <rdfs:range rdf:resource="&rdf;Seq"/>
     <rdfs:containerRange rdf:resource="&rdf;Literal"/>

--- Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur
     Whatever is said in Latin sounds important.
Received on Tuesday, 25 April 2000 09:52:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:07:29 UTC