W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > April 2000

SV: The semantic web

From: Greg FitzPatrick <gf@medianet.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 14:52:59 +0200
To: "Tom Van Eetvelde" <tom.van_eetvelde@alcatel.be>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <NCBBJIFAOLHFMAPPOLHCKEHJCOAA.gf@medianet.org>
If you look in the mail archives you will find Tim B-L's comment on this.

You will have to look carefully since Tim misspelled the names of the
authors.

Which just goes to show that the semantic web will have to be "spell-proof".

Greg

> -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> Från: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org
> [mailto:www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org]För Tom Van Eetvelde
> Skickat: den 11 april 2000 14:10
> Till: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> Ämne: The semantic web
>
>
> Hello RDF community,
>
> I have read the article "Practical Knowledge Representation for the Web" (
> http://www.cs.vu.nl/~frankh/postscript/IJCAI99-III.html#Calvanese:
> 98AAAI ) and to my surprise, RDF
> is depicted as an immature and disappointing language for
> representing semantics. This is in clear
> contrast with the promise of RDF as the language to make the
> Semantic Web come true.
> The authors could be biased as they come from the AI world, but
> nevertheless, their arguments seem
> well founded to me.
>
> Does anyone have comments on this article?
>
> Regards,
>
> Tom.
>
Received on Tuesday, 11 April 2000 08:53:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:43 GMT