W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > September 1999

RE: a questioin on use of RDF

From: <franklin.reynolds@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 19:56:48 +0300
Message-ID: <B9CFA6CE8FFDD211A1FB0008C7894E460BF1FE@bseis01nok>
To: sv@crystaliz.com, franklin.reynolds@nokia.com, hjelm@w3.org
Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Thanks for the pointer. Has all the RDF in the document been
run through a parser like SIRPAC? 

Franklin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: EXT Sankar Virdhagriswaran [mailto:sv@crystaliz.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 1999 6:07 PM
> To: franklin.reynolds@nokia.com; hjelm@w3.org
> Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> Subject: Re: a questioin on use of RDF
> 
> 
> This is in response to both your note as well as a note about network
> effects with RDF.
> 
> > The idea of "cards" for sites and people seems reasonable.
> > I am not familiar with VCard. What information is contained in
> > a vcard?
> >
> 
> A URL for expressing VCard was sent earlier to this mailing 
> list. Did you
> get it?
> 
> Here it is:
> 
> http://archive.dstc.edu.au/RDU/RDF/draft-iannella-vcard-rdf-00.txt
> 
> > I guess I am suggesting something like a "home page card".
> >
> 
> Yup. That is the idea I started with.
> 
> > I am working on semantic web crawlers and search engines. Anybody
> > else?
> >
> 
> One way to achieve 'network effect' is to have such a semantic search
> engine. Another is to perform some kind of linking. Both of these are
> reasonable. However, both of them rest on the node that 
> describes about
> itself. So, I wanted to start there. Also, uses of linking 
> for annotation or
> commentary or review adds additional complexity (technical 
> and social), that
> I did not want to swallow first. However, I do thinking that 'semantic
> linking' is interesting.
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 30 September 1999 12:57:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:41 GMT