W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > December 1999

Re: Resources and URIs

From: Sergey Melnik <melnik@DB.Stanford.EDU>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 18:34:40 -0800
Message-ID: <3855ACC0.A7FF8B08@db.stanford.edu>
To: Jonas Liljegren <jonas@paranormal.o.se>
CC: RDF Intrest Group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Jonas Liljegren wrote:
> 
> Sergey Melnik wrote:
> >
> > Gabe Beged-Dov wrote:
> >
> > > IMO, the  resources  (and triples) that are embedded in a particular model should be
> > > labeled using fragment identifiers rather than standalone URI. They should be
> > > "relative" resources  (as in not absolute).  If we can figure out a workable content
> > > based algorithm then this could be the ID for these relative resources.
> > > The fragment scheme for rdf would support two types of fragment identifiers for
> > > resources, those that are explicitly named using rdf:ID and those that are generated.
> >
> > Agreed.
> 
> I do not agree that triples in a model should be labled using fragment
> identifiers rather
> than standalone URI.

Sorry, I oversaw "(and triples)" in Gabe's statement. Correction:
anonymous resources should have relative URIs, triples should have
unique URIs.

Sergey
Received on Tuesday, 14 December 1999 09:49:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:42 GMT