W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > December 1999

Re: URIs vs URLs?

From: Jonas Liljegren <jonas@paranormal.o.se>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 20:20:28 +0100
Message-ID: <385546FC.4E4A0DEF@paranormal.o.se>
To: Daniel LaLiberte <liberte@w3.org>, RDF Intrest Group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Daniel LaLiberte wrote:
> 
> Jonas Liljegren writes:
>  > Now, assuming MD5 model URIs, we would like to differ between:
>  >
>  >  1. The URI of the service
>  >  2. The URL of the service
>  >  3. The URI for the physical person
>  >  4. The URI of the model describing the person
>  >  5. The URL of the model describing the person
>  >  6. The URI of the model describing the service
>  >  7. The URL of the model describing the service
> 
> I'm curious what you are thinking of as the difference between URIs and
> URLs.

With the suggested RDF API, the model URI would be a MD5 digest, but the
model URL would be the place there you can get it.

To minimize confusion about what the URI denotes, the person URI should
not be a URL leading to a document. All URIs leading to a document would
be seen as the URI of that document, rather than the URI for something
in "the real world".

See the previous discussion on this:
   
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/1999Dec/0055.html
    

-- 
/ Jonas  -  http://paranormal.o.se/perl/proj/rdf/schema_editor/
Received on Monday, 13 December 1999 14:11:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:42 GMT