W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-dspace@w3.org > June 2003

RE: Provenance for section 3 in technologies.tex

From: Butler, Mark <Mark_Butler@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 13:11:43 +0100
Message-ID: <5E13A1874524D411A876006008CD059F066A1DB3@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: www-rdf-dspace@w3.org

Hi Dave
> Non-standard extensions would be best avoided if you want 
> SIMILE to be a full
> participant in the semantic web.

But to take this back to my original suggestion does this apply to quads? My
understanding from Andy is that they are used by RDFStore and a number of
RSS processors, and from Jeremy that although Jena 2 does not have a quads
API it does actually use a quad data structure "under the hood". So although
they are non-standard at the moment, people are using them, so should we
really rule them out?

I'd be interested in feedback here from Eric Miller and David Karger also?


Received on Thursday, 26 June 2003 08:12:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:13:06 UTC