Re: language tags

(Please delete cc to www-rdf-comments if replying on public-owl-dev)

See RFC 4646

http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4646.txt

obsoletes 3066

But
http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/#section-Graph-Literal
[[
Plain literals have a lexical form and optionally a language tag as 
defined by [RFC-3066], normalized to lowercase.
]]

and

http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#sec-lang-tag
[[
The values of the attribute are language identifiers as defined by [IETF 
RFC 3066], Tags for the Identification of Languages, or its successor; 
in addition, the empty string may be specified.
]]

Hmmm, seems like a bug in my text in rdf-concepts, the XML text is 
better, and refers to 4646

Jeremy

Boris Motik wrote:
> Hello,
> 
>  
> 
> Yes, these were meant to be as in RFC 3066. I’ll add a note into the bug 
> list, so that we can repair this in course of the standardization process.
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks for pointing this out!
> 
>  
> 
>             Boris
> 
>  
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> *From:* public-owl-dev-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-owl-dev-request@w3.org] *On Behalf Of *Matthew Pocock
> *Sent:* 03 April 2007 14:12
> *To:* public-owl-dev@w3.org
> *Subject:* language tags
> 
>  
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The owl 1.1 spec uses languageTag in the definition of typedConstant. 
> This isn't referenced anywhere. Are these language tags according to rfc 
> 3066, or some other standard? Could we have a link to the relevant spec 
> in the document please?
> 
> http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3066.html
> 
> Matthew
> 
> (feeling extra pedantic today)
> 

-- 
Hewlett-Packard Limited
registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
Registered No: 690597 England