W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > April to June 2006

Re: Form Post from Firefox

From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 06:27:22 +0100
Message-ID: <4456EDBA.7080406@ninebynine.org>
To: www-rdf-comments@w3.org

Dan Brickley wrote:
> * Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org> [2006-05-01 11:32-0400]
>> Just to clarify things, I don't think there are "RDF specs" and "RDF 
>> syntax" affected other than RDF/XML are there?
> RDF/XML yup, perhaps GRDDL, RDF/A might touch on this too; but I was also 
> thinking about any future alternate XML encodings. Not that I'm yet
> convinced this is needed; I just wanted to make sure the point was noted
> on the appropriate list.

It seems to me that this is a consequence of the "open tag set" problem of
RDF/XML.  Other XML encodings that use a fixed tag set for RDF "syntax" wouldn't
have the problem of distinguishing between RDF vocabulary and other annotations.


Graham Klyne
For email:
Received on Tuesday, 2 May 2006 05:28:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:15:23 UTC