W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > April to June 2006

Re: Form Post from Firefox

From: Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 11:32:49 -0400
Message-ID: <44562A21.3090007@acm.org>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
CC: Andrew Houghton <houghton@bright.net>, www-rdf-comments@w3.org

Just to clarify things, I don't think there are "RDF specs" and "RDF 
syntax" affected other than RDF/XML are there?

--Frank

Dan Brickley wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> I'm redirecting this from www-rdf-validator to www-rdf-comments
> so it'll get picked up by any new work on the RDF specs, since your
> issue seems to be more to do with the RDF syntax than the W3C
> validation service. (except for the PNG thing...)
> 
> cheers,
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> * Andrew Houghton <houghton@bright.net> [2006-04-30 10:54-0400]
>> report=The validator considers attributes in the xsi namespace on the
>> RDF/XML document element to be properties, rather than ignoring them as
>> properties, as it does with attributes in the xml namespace.
>>
>> By not ignoring attributes in the xsi namespace you are not able to assign
>> an XML schema to an RDF/XML instance document.  While assigning an XML
>> schema is not necessary for RDF/XML you may wish to restrict the structre
>> and what elements are valid when creating an instance of your metadata.
>>
>> BTW, the visual graph (PNG embedded) was working, but then it abruptly
>> stopped working, saying empty graph file.
>>
>> RDF=<?xml version="1.0">
>> <?xml version="1.0"?>
>> <rdf:RDF
>>   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
>>   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>>   xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
>>   xml:base="urn:my-base:"
>>   xml:lang="en"
>>   xsi:schemaLocation="urn:my-rdf-instance my-rdf-instance.xsd"
>>   <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/">
>>     <dc:title>World Wide Web Consortium</dc:title> 
>>   </rdf:Description>
>> </rdf:RDF>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 1 May 2006 15:27:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:34 GMT