RDF Team-- My suggestion is that you base the formal semantics of RDF on the work of Chris Strachey, Dana Scott, etc. -- i.e. on "denotational semantics" and set theory-- rather than on model-theory/graph-theory. The primary reason is that graph theory will not (easily) support Boolean query languages on the structures. To support the semantics of Boolean query languages, you need to use set-theory directly. Chris Strachey developed something based on triples years ago, but I have not been able to find the reference to it. I would need to ask some of my colleagues to hunt it down. Here is one reference. If you are interested in pursuing this further, please let me know, and I will provide additional references. http://vmoc.museophile.com/pioneers/strachey.html Thanks, Terry Hardgrave terry.hardgrave@ed.gov terry.hardgrave@pearson.comReceived on Thursday, 16 June 2005 14:55:34 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:34 GMT