W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > April to June 2005

Re: Error in RDF/XML Syntax Specification?

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 13:50:01 -0400
To: "McBride, Brian" <brian.mcbride@hp.com>
Cc: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>, Arjohn Kampman <arjohn.kampman@aduna.biz>, Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <20050405175001.GJ20055@homer.w3.org>

* McBride, Brian <brian.mcbride@hp.com> [2005-04-05 17:40+0100]
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: www-rdf-comments-request@w3.org 
> > [mailto:www-rdf-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Graham Klyne
> > Sent: 05 April 2005 10:36
> > To: Arjohn Kampman; Dave Beckett
> > Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
> > Subject: Re: Error in RDF/XML Syntax Specification?
> > 
> > 
> > While I agree with David and Arjohn that ""^^<datatype> 
> > SHOULD be expressible, I think it's not quite such a 
> > no-brainer that it should be accepted without Due Process.
> > 
> > In cases like this, what is the W3C process for agreeing 
> > changes to a published recommendation?
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2004/02/Process-20040205/process.html#rec-modify

It seems to assume a WG will be around to handle the fixups...

Hmm implicitly it doesn't:
	for this reason, the scope of a Working Group charter generally allows
	time for work after publication of a Recommendation. 

I guess we'll do what we can with the resources available.

Dan
Received on Tuesday, 5 April 2005 17:50:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:34 GMT