I know the following could seem a little stupid to you, but in my opinion
the "rdfs:range" of "rdfs:predicate" being a not-better-specified
just because reifications should be able to model statement errors is pretty
letting horses having "things" instead of "feet", just because someone could
erroneously state that a horse has four "frogs" attached to its legs - put
it simple,
it's conceptually incorrect...

Can you please tell me where exactly is my mistake?

Ok, that's all, I won't bother you anymore, I promise!
Thanks again for your great feedback,

Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around