Re: [closed] Re: Missing test:entailmentRules arcs

Sandro,

Given that your acceptance in
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003OctDec/0176.html

and below

[[
That should be interesting.  Since you chose to consider both the same
issue, it's not closed until that one is answered.
]]

I'm interpretting this as acceptably closed.

Brian


Sandro Hawke wrote:
>>On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Sandro Hawke wrote:
>>
>>
>>>The following entailment tests are not really defined (and dont work
>>>in my test harness), since they have no entailmentRules data:
>>>
>>>http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/datatypes/Manifest.rdf#test008
>>>http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/datatypes/Manifest.rdf#test009
>>>http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/Manifest.rdf#test
>>
>>007a
>>
>>>http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/Manifest.rdf#test
>>
>>007b
>>
>>>http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xmllang/Manifest.rdf#test
>>
>>007c
>>
>>An explicit marker has been added to those test cases, and the following
>>editorial text added to the test case document:
>>
>>[[
>>For test cases that use simple entailment, the following marker is
>>used:
>>
>><test:entailmentRules rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfco
>>re/testSchema#simpleEntailment" />
>>]]
>>
>>This should permit you to exactly identify those test cases.
> 
> 
> Yeah, in so far as we don't call this an RDF graph.  :-(
> 
> 
>>A response to your related comment will follow shortly.
> 
> 
> That should be interesting.  Since you chose to consider both the same
> issue, it's not closed until that one is answered.    (And given your
> answer to this one, I can't imagine how you'll have a satisfactory
> response to that one.)
> 
>       -- sandro