Re: character encoding in RDF (including some new related issues)

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Subject: Re: character encoding in RDF (including some new related issues)
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 10:02:44 +0000

> Hi Peter, Dave,
> 
> Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > This seems to be the best way of handling this issue. 
> > 
> 
> [...]
> 
> >>>
> >>>I await a revised, fully-worked-out proposal for the actual changes.
> >>
> >>You've raised some more things each time for us to answer so you'll
> >>have to let me know.
> > 
> > 
> > Umm, I think that something is backward here.  My understanding of the
> > review process is that I, as a reviewer, point out problems with the
> > document(s).  You, as an RDF Core WG member, make changes to the documents,
> > which may or may not be satisfactory to me.  All the rest is simply being
> > helpful - I make suggestions as to what might fix the problems I point out;
> > you ask in advance whether a proposed partial solution to a problem might
> > be satisfactory.  
> > 
> > In light of this process, then, my response was indicating that I thought
> > that the general approach that you suggest was a good direction in which to
> > go, but that I am not willing to give final approval until I see the final
> > changes.
> 
> Right.  Thanks Peter for pointing out the issue and for your suggestions 
> and help in working out how it might be addressed.
> 
> If I've understood correctly, you and Dave have worked out a series of 
> changes to the doc that should fix the problem.
> 
> Dave, I think what Peter is saying here is that he needs to see these in 
> situ, e.g. editted into the editors draft before he can be sure they 
> correctly deal with the issue raised.  So having agreed a plan, the next 
> step is to integrate the changes and then ask Peter to review, i.e. 
> propose closure of the comment.
> 
> Does that work for everyone?
> 
> Brian

Works for me.

peter

Received on Friday, 7 November 2003 06:05:40 UTC