Re: [closed] xmlsch-12 capricious syntax

On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 18:00, Brian McBride wrote:
> 
> C. M. Sperberg-McQueen wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > 
> > The WG did not approve a formal response to this disposition,
> > because owing to an error on my part we did not have your
> > response in front of us; my apologies.  We look forward to
> > the work you project for the future on RDF syntax.
...
> 
> I've recorded this as a "no response" in our comments disposition with a 
> link to your mail.  Let me know if this is not ok.
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#xmlsch-12

I think that's the correct way to record it.  Thanks.

Michael