Re: XML literals, canonical form, and normal form C problem

So be it.

peter

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Subject: Re: XML literals, canonical form, and normal form C problem
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 16:19:00 +0300

> Peter:
> > My view is that the proposed changes to the documents, while technically
> > sufficient, are nonetheless insufficient.
> 
> Hi Peter,
> 
> we brieifly discussed this thread at the RDF Core WG telecon.
> 
> The editors indicated that we had made changes to fix the more substantive 
> problems that you raised; but that you still said that further editorial 
> changes were in order. Neither the syntax editor nor myself are inclined to 
> make such changes. 
> 
> (I at least would not see them as improvements).
> 
> We indicated to the WG that it was unclear whether you would formally object 
> or not.
> 
> We are not envisaging further changes concerning this topic before the planned 
> second last call.
> 
> Jeremy