Re: Inconsistency in N-Triples "language" Production Case

On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 08:12:57 +0100
"Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com> wrote:

> 
> The file example08.nt [1], as referenced from RDF/XML Syntax
> Specification [2], contains the following literal N-Triples production
> instance:-
> 
>    "RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised)"@en-US
> 
> According to the language production [3] in the latest rdf-testcases
> WD, however, upper case characters are forbidden. Is rdf-testcases in
> error, or example08.nt?

example08.nt was in error in that it doesn't match the N-Triples
specification.  I have corrected it for the next rdf/xml draft.

Thanks

Dave