W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > July to September 2003

Re: Test cases: XML Literal value space and exclusive canonicalization

From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 11:23:47 -0400
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.J.20030815112304.05f441e8@localhost>
To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org, Benja Fallenstein <b.fallenstein@gmx.de>, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org, msm@w3.org

Hello Dave,

Many thanks for this work.     Regards,  Martin.

At 10:39 03/08/15 +0100, Dave Beckett wrote:

>Preserving the thread, but answering just this point:
>
>On Mon, 04 Aug 2003 10:55:01 -0400 Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org> wrote:
>
><snip/> [on A) "<br/"> canonicalization ]
>
> > I agree that it would be a bad idea to try to provide an exc-C14N
> > test suite. I think it would be good to add an example like this
> > just to document how RDF/XML syntax, lexical value, and so on,
> > are related, and in particular, that they are not exactly the same.
>
>The RDF Core WG has agreed to add a test to the RDF Core testcases
>on this point, canonicalizing "<br/>" as "<br></br>".   My proposal in
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Aug/0061.html
>was accepted and we chose option 1 which is as follows:
>
>[[
>input rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure/test006.rdf
>
><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
>           xmlns:eg="http://example.org/">
>   <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.org/foo">
>     <eg:bar rdf:parseType="Literal"><br/></eg:bar>
>   </rdf:Description>
></rdf:RDF>
>
>output rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure/test006.nt
>
><http://example.org/foo> <http://example.org/bar> 
>"<br></br>"^^<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#XMLLiteral> .
>]]
>
>Dave
Received on Friday, 15 August 2003 14:47:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:32 GMT