- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 08:54:48 +0100
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- CC: jjc@hpl.hp.com, www-rdf-comments@w3.org, phayes@ihmc.us
>
> Well, I certainly didn't read ``correspond'' as ``directly 1-1 encode octet
> sequences that are''. I read ``correspond'' as ``canonicalizes to'', or
> some similar phrase. I don't see ``1-1'' in the 28 July draft at all.
>
In another thread, on RDF Core/I18N, we are talking about the word
correspond in the defn of the lexical space.
I suggested the following bullet point:
[A set of Unicode strings which]
[[
+ correspond under [UTF-8] encoding to exclusive Canonical
XML (with comments, with empty InclusiveNamespaces
PrefixList ) [XML-XC14N];
]]
Martin Duerst suggests:
[[
I think 'when encoded as [UTF-8]' would be slightly easier
to understand than 'under [UTF-8] encoding'.
]]
I take you to prefer not using the word 'correspond' at all, so combining
I get:
+ when encoded as [UTF-8] are exclusive Canonical
XML (with comments, with empty InclusiveNamespaces
PrefixList ) [XML-XC14N];
and I think that in this way we can get rid of the 'correspond' word
throughout.
Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 14 August 2003 03:55:25 UTC