Re: [proposed close: pfps-05]

> 
> Well, I certainly didn't read ``correspond'' as ``directly 1-1 encode octet
> sequences that are''.  I read ``correspond'' as ``canonicalizes to'', or
> some similar phrase.  I don't see ``1-1'' in the 28 July draft at all.
> 


In another thread, on RDF Core/I18N, we are talking about the word 
correspond in the defn of the lexical space.

I suggested the following bullet point:

[A set of Unicode strings which]

[[
   + correspond  under [UTF-8] encoding to exclusive Canonical
     XML (with comments, with empty InclusiveNamespaces
     PrefixList ) [XML-XC14N];
]]

Martin Duerst suggests:
[[
I think 'when encoded as [UTF-8]' would be slightly easier
to understand than 'under [UTF-8] encoding'.
]]

I take you to prefer not using the word 'correspond' at all, so combining

I get:

   + when encoded as [UTF-8] are exclusive Canonical
     XML (with comments, with empty InclusiveNamespaces
     PrefixList ) [XML-XC14N];

and I think that in this way we can get rid of the 'correspond' word 
throughout.

Jeremy