W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > July to September 2003

Re: Test cases: XML Literal value space and exclusive canonicalization

From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 12:17:50 +0100
Message-Id: <>
To: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>, Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org, pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, Benja Fallenstein <b.fallenstein@gmx.de>, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org, msm@w3.org

At 13:55 04/08/03 -0400, Martin Duerst wrote:
>Yes, in particular most C0 control characters, in XML 1.0.
>Most of that will be changed in XML 1.1. The NULL character
>(U+0000) still isn't legal XML 1.1, as far as I know.

I'm offline, so can't check, but I thought many (but not all) of the 
control characters not allowed in XML 1.0 remained so in 1.1.

See my message ...



Graham Klyne          _________
GK@ninebynine.org  ___|_o_o_o_|_
(nb Helva)       ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~   @Cliveden, River Thames
Received on Sunday, 10 August 2003 07:57:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:15:21 UTC