- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2003 05:27:58 -0400 (EDT)
- To: dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org, duerst@w3.org
From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk> Subject: Re: support XML Literals in RDF (was Re: Test cases: XML Literal value space and exclusive canonicalization) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 12:22:00 +0100 > On Thu, 07 Aug 2003 07:02:52 -0400 > "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote: [...] > > Although any RDF-only application, i.e., an application that *only* > > needs to determine the RDF implications of an RDF graph, does not need > > any special code to support XML Literals beyond the code needed to > > support sequences of octets, an RDF application that goes beyond these > > implications, for example to determine whether a literal is in LV, will > > need considerable code to support XML Literals. I was wrong. Even rdf-entailment requires access to an oracle to determine whether an octet-sequence is in canonical form. Rule rdf2 requires access to such an oracle. [...] Peter F. Patel-Schneider Bell Labs Research Lucent Technologies
Received on Friday, 8 August 2003 05:40:30 UTC