W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > July to September 2003

Re: [proposal to close] pfps-22,pfps-23: "reserved names in abstract syntax"

From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 12:26:16 +0100
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: gk@ninebynine.org, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <20030807122616.74d2ff8b.dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>

On Thu, 07 Aug 2003 06:45:58 -0400 (EDT)
"Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote:

> Dave said:
> >  [[The RDF vocabulary is identified by this namespace name and 
> >   consists of the following names only:]]
> 
> I am concerned with the ``identified by this namespace name''.  A namespace
> name does not identify a vocabulary.  

Please explain why this is not the case.

Dave
Received on Thursday, 7 August 2003 07:28:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:32 GMT