W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > July to September 2003

Re: [resolution]pfps-04; was: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning RDF closure rules

From: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 11:22:09 -0500
Message-Id: <p06001a09bb5589d78e2d@[10.0.1.3]>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org

>From: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
>Subject: [resolution]pfps-04; was: Comment on Last Call Working 
>Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning RDF closure rules
>Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 18:20:43 -0500
>
>>  Peter,
>>
>>  with reference to your comment
>>  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0091.html
>>
>>  archived as pfps-04, I am writing to ask whether the following would
>>  be acceptable as a response. If so, I will suggest that the WG accept
>>  your comment with this resolution.
>>
>>    As you know, there have been extensive modifications to the RDF
>>  entailment rules since your comment was written
>>
>>  The current editor's draft
>>  http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes/RDF_Semant_Edit_Weak.html
>>  now contains a version of the RDF entailment rules which I believe
>>  corresponds directly to the RDF semantic conditions in the sense
>>  described. You can check the proof at
>> 
>>http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes/RDF_Semant_Edit_Weak.html#RDFEntailmentLemmaPrf
>>
>>  Please reply to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org,
>>  indicating whether this response adequately addresses your comment.
>>
>>  Sincerely
>>
>>  --
>>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>  IHMC	(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
>>  40 South Alcaniz St.	(850)202 4416   office
>>  Pensacola			(850)202 4440   fax
>>  FL 32501			(850)291 0667    cell
>>  phayes@ihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
>>
>
>I view the current version of the RDF entailment rules (31 July) as seriously
>incomplete, as the RDF entailment lemma requires use of a semantic
>relationship.  Therefore, I do not feel that my concerns have been
>adequately addressed.

Is this perception of 'serious incompleteness' is the only concern 
you have, or if there are any others?

Pat
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC	(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.	(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501			(850)291 0667    cell
phayes@ihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Tuesday, 5 August 2003 12:28:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:32 GMT