W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > July to September 2003

[closing?] pfps-14 "Social Meaning and RDF"

From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 16:21:04 +0100
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20030729161109.01e8faa0@127.0.0.1>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org

Peter,

Further to your comment, recorded against the RDF Concepts document:
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-14
and your earlier response (below):

The RDF Concepts editors' draft [1] is now in what we believe to be a 
near-final form.    The full list of changes to RDF Concepts in response to 
this comment is listed in appendix A.1:
[[
Deleted section 4 about social meaning. cf msg from meeting at tech 
plenary. Also removed previous section 2.2.8 ("A Basis for Binding 
Agreements") as this also related to social meaning. Also: removed mention 
in section 3.3. Datatypes about the defining authority of a datatype URI. 
Small consequential changes in abstract and introduction and bulleted list 
at start of section 2.2. Consequential deletion of [HTTP] and [URI-REG] 
references.
]]

[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-concepts-20030117/

Can you please indicate, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org, whether or not 
the noted changes in this document have addressed the issue to your 
satisfaction.

Thank you,

#g
--

At 07:37 14/03/03 -0500, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:

>From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
>Subject: [closed] pfps-14 "Social Meaning and RDF"
>Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:57:31 +0000
>
> > Subject: [closed] pfps-14 "Social Meaning and RDF"
> >
> > You raised made a last call comment [pfps-14] captured in:
> >
> >     http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-14
> >
> > The RDFCore WG has resolved:
> >
> >     http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0068.html
> >
> > to accept this comment,
> >
> > by removing the section on social meaning from the Concepts document,
> > per WG proposal:
> >
> >     http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0029.html
> >
> > Please reply to this email, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org indicating
> > whether this decision is acceptable.
>
>Hmm.  I don't view this as a comprehensive response to my comments on this
>issue.
>
>I particular my message referenced in the issue list doesn't even mention
>the section on social meaning.
>
>I await identification of other changes that may be done in response to
>this comment.
>
> > Thank you for your attention,
> >
> > #g
>
>
>peter

-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>
PGP: 0FAA 69FF C083 000B A2E9  A131 01B9 1C7A DBCA CB5E
Received on Tuesday, 29 July 2003 11:24:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:32 GMT