- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 09:58:33 +0100
- To: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
For information, a restriction to non-relative URI forms in the normative section of Concepts was accidentally dropped in the editing process, and is being reinstated. #g -- At 02:31 29/07/03 -0500, pat hayes wrote: >>The document http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/, referred to by >>http://www.w3.org/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-mt-20030117/ as the definition of >>URIref, only requires that a URIref be a Unicode string that would produce >>a valid URI under a certain encoding. >> >>This appears to allow for any sort of URI, including relative URIs, which >>could clash with the Lbase special names. > >This entire issue was beneath the radar when the Lbase note was written. I >do not consider it to be a matter worthy of discussion, since Lbase is not >intended to be a language for processing by machines, and the note says >explicitly that the exact syntax is not important. If any such syntactic >accident should arise it can treated in an ad-hoc manner, eg by writing >all URIrefs in one font and the special names in a different font. ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org> PGP: 0FAA 69FF C083 000B A2E9 A131 01B9 1C7A DBCA CB5E
Received on Tuesday, 29 July 2003 09:43:41 UTC