W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > July to September 2003

Re: pfps-10 untyped literals

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 11:31:31 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <20030728.113131.78839385.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Cc: phayes@ai.uwf.edu, www-rdf-comments@w3.org

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Subject: pfps-10 untyped literals
Date: 28 Jul 2003 16:18:39 +0100

> Peter,
> This message is in regard to a last call comment you made on the RDFCore
> semantics document, recorded as:
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-10
> The WG responded, accepting your comment
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003AprJun/0080.html
> Your response was recorded as pending:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003AprJun/0124.html
> As you know we have continued to refine the semantics document, and I
> would like to check whether, with the latest editors draft:
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-mt-20030117/
> we can record that the disposition of your comment is satisfactory. 
> Please reply, as usual, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org.
> Brian

I believe, from my recent review of this document, that it adequately
addresses my concerns. 

However, I believe that the reason this issue was marked as ``pending'' was
that I would have liked to have seen explicit references to the changes
made to the RDF Semantics document.  

Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Bell Labs Research
Lucent Technologies
Received on Monday, 28 July 2003 11:33:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:15:21 UTC