W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > July to September 2003

Re: [resolution]pfps-02; was: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning Lbase translation of XML Literals

From: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 14:08:57 -0500
Message-Id: <p06001233bb29efe42897@[10.0.100.7]>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org

>I don't see how there can be a satisfactory solution at the moment as there
>is no stable version of LBase to translate into, so I cannot determine any
>enduring characteristics of the translation.

I would note that the entire section is an informative appendix.

>Under the current editor's working copy available as of 2 July
>2003, some RDF literals (e.g., " ' ") translate into illegal LBase.

Ah, because I removed the backslash escapes. I put in a textual 
warning about this, but maybe it would be better to put the full form 
back into the tables.

Ok, done. I also added a note about LanguageTag.

>  I
>noticed this in a very quick perusal of the LBase document - I would need
>much more time for a complete examination, which seems rather pointless to
>do on an editor's working copy.

Point taken. In fact the substantive parts of the Lbase document have 
been stable for a long time, but the status of the document seems to 
be frozen in some W3C administrative hyperspace. I will try to get 
that fixed ASAP and get back to you.

Enjoy the holiday.

Pat

>Peter F. Patel-Schneider
>Bell Labs Research
>Lucent Technologies
>
>
>From: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
>Subject: [resolution]pfps-02; was: Comment on Last Call Working 
>Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning Lbase translation of XML 
>Literals
>Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 19:26:49 -0500
>
>>  Peter,
>>
>>  with reference to your comment
>>  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0093.html
>>
>>  archived as pfps-02, I am writing to ask if the following would be an
>>  acceptable response. If so, I will propose that the WG accept your
>>  comment with this resolution.
>>
>>  As you know, there have been extensive modifications to the treatment
>>  of XML literals since your comment was written.
>>
>>  The current editor's draft
>>  http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes/RDF_Semant_Edit_Weak.html#Lbase
>>  now contains a version of the Lbase translation rules which I believe
>>  adequately covers the case you mention. XML Literals are now treated
>>  exactly uniformly with other typed literals in the Lbase axioms.
>>  Please reply to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org,
>>  indicating whether this response adequately addresses your comment.
>>
>>  Sincerely
>>
>>  Pat
>>  --
>>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>  IHMC	(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
>>  40 South Alcaniz St.	(850)202 4416   office
>>  Pensacola			(850)202 4440   fax
>>  FL 32501			(850)291 0667    cell
>>  phayes@ihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
>>


-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC	(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.	(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501			(850)291 0667    cell
phayes@ihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Thursday, 3 July 2003 15:08:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:32 GMT