Peter, with reference to your comment http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0093.html archived as pfps-02, I am writing to ask if the following would be an acceptable response. If so, I will propose that the WG accept your comment with this resolution. As you know, there have been extensive modifications to the treatment of XML literals since your comment was written. The current editor's draft http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes/RDF_Semant_Edit_Weak.html#Lbase now contains a version of the Lbase translation rules which I believe adequately covers the case you mention. XML Literals are now treated exactly uniformly with other typed literals in the Lbase axioms. Please reply to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org, indicating whether this response adequately addresses your comment. Sincerely Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayesReceived on Wednesday, 2 July 2003 20:26:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 24 April 2007 12:17:13 GMT