W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > April to June 2003

Re: pfps-12 lists are not well formed

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 08:05:53 -0400
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: tolle@dbis.informatik.uni-frankfurt.de, bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <20030620120553.GC7599@tux.w3.org>

* Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> [2003-06-18 16:04-0400]
> This appears to be on the right track, but I have no way of viewing the
> other changes, and no way of viewing the changes in context, so I don't see
> how I can determine whether the changes are satisfactory.

Fair point. The WD text has changed little since last call. I have some 
outstanding edits derrived from other LC comments, but nothing (to my
knowledge) which should impact on this issue.

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-schema-20030117/ is the 
LC text plus some minor edits:

----------------------------
revision 1.12
date: 2003/04/11 13:58:50;  author: danbri;  state: Exp;  lines: +1 -1
Fixed typo per:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0416.html:wq
----------------------------
revision 1.11
date: 2003/01/24 18:03:53;  author: danbri;  state: Exp;  lines: +51 -43
fixed date errors.
----------------------------

I plan to make some more modest updates in-place at that URL (with 
'status' updated accordingly to avoid confusion), until we agree new URIs for 
the next batch of TR-published RDFCore docs.

My editorial todo list is based on the issue closures linked from 
our LC issue list, see http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#schema

I hope this clarifies the state of the doc for you. If I commit changes 
to the spec I'll make these explicit so you can see what's what.

cheers,

Dan
Received on Friday, 20 June 2003 08:07:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:32 GMT