W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > April to June 2003

Re: problem with N-Triples

From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 14:11:19 +0100
To: danny666 <danny666@virgilio.it>
Cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, www-rdf-comments <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20030610141119.36fea847.dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>

On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 13:43:01 +0200
Danny Ayers <danny666@virgilio.it> wrote:

> 
> I've just hit this one with a parser based on RFC 2396 absolute URI, which
> as Peter pointed out doesn't include fragments (hence '#' chokes my parser).
> Leaving the definition to the RFC makes sense, but the question remains -
> which production(s)? Any uriref (including relative, with queries etc) or
> just absolute + frag?

If your parser chokes on '#' it won't be much good for URI references
in any syntax.

As I said:

> > I have already decided here to change the reference to point to the
> > definition of RDF URI Reference as given in the RDF Concepts WD:
> >   http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/#dfn-URI-reference
> > and say less here.  The N-Triples doc will then just describe how to
> > encode such things into N-Triples.

so ask the concepts editors about which productions, since I'm
removing that reference and sticking only to telling you it encodes.

Dave
Received on Tuesday, 10 June 2003 09:12:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:32 GMT