W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > April to June 2003

Re: problem with closures in RDF Semantics document (version of 6 June 2003)

From: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 09:57:11 -0500
Message-Id: <p0521060abb0a50182162@[10.0.100.24]>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org

>The wording for closures is not correct.
>
>For example, rdf-closures are defined in Section 4.1 using
>
>	Apply the rules se1 and se2 and .... to generate all RDF triples
>	(i.e.[,] until none of the rules apply or the graph is unchanged.)
>	[sic]
>
>However, if an RDF graph contains any triples always possible to apply rule
>se1 in a way that changes the graph.

Yes, this needs to be reworded slightly. It is only necessary to use 
these rules to generate a single generalization of each generalizable 
triple to produce a closure. I will add prose to this effect.

Pat

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC			(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.		(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola              			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501           			(850)291 0667    cell
phayes@ai.uwf.edu	          http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
s.pam@ai.uwf.edu   for spam
Received on Monday, 9 June 2003 10:57:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:32 GMT