W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > April to June 2003

Re: invalid n-triples files in test cases

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 08:53:48 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <20030530.085348.01632684.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk
Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org

From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: invalid n-triples files in test cases
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 13:46:00 +0100 (BST)

> On Fri, 30 May 2003, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> 
> > From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
> > Subject: Re: invalid n-triples files in test cases
> > Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 13:22:07 +0100 (BST)
> >
> > > On Thu, 29 May 2003, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > The documents at
> > > >
> > > > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test001.nt
> > > >
> > > > and
> > > >
> > > > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test002.nt
> > > >
> > > > do not appear to be valid N-Triples documents because they are missing the
> > > > final end-of-line.
> > >
> > > Noted, thanks.
> >
> > How about a fix?
> 
> My pleasure. I've just checked in fixed copies of all the NTriples files
> in that directory that were missing EOLs. I'll run over the others now.

Thanks.  I wonder how these files managed to pass the other
implementations.


peter
Received on Friday, 30 May 2003 08:54:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:32 GMT