This could be an RDF issue, but given OWL's relationship to DAML+OIL, I think it could reasonably be handled by WebOnt. DAML+OIL had daml:item. While not strictly necessary, i've been encountering a fair number of DAML+OIL ontologies which use it, and the alternative formulations (e.g., for typed lists) is fairly cumbersome. So, I'd like it added back in. Cheers, Bijan Parsia.Received on Friday, 9 May 2003 19:45:05 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:32 GMT