daml:item

• From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
• Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 19:45:12 -0400
• To: public comments <public-webont-comments@w3.org>
• Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
• Message-Id: <47015FE7-8278-11D7-87F9-0003939E0B44@isr.umd.edu>

This could be an RDF issue, but given OWL's relationship to DAML+OIL, I 
think it could reasonably be handled by WebOnt.

DAML+OIL had daml:item. While not strictly necessary, i've been 
encountering a fair number of DAML+OIL ontologies which use it, and the 
alternative formulations (e.g., for typed lists) is fairly cumbersome.

So, I'd like it added back in.

Cheers,
Bijan Parsia.

Received on Friday, 9 May 2003 19:45:05 UTC