At 15:25 19/04/2003 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: >Consider adding to RDFS a triviallyTrue predicate; >specification: > > ?S rdfs:triviallyTrue ?O. > >is true for all ?S and ?O. > >Rationale: > >(1) jeremy's digital signature application needs >to number bnodes > >(2) folks are asking for all uses of rdfs:comment >to be vacuously true. This would provide that >functionality. > >Options: > >call it noop or... hmm... rdfs:comment really is Recorded as http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#danc-04Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2003 08:40:39 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 24 April 2007 12:17:12 GMT