Re: error in Semantics document

Per, re. your comment

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0206.html

the passage to which you refer has been removed and replaced by the following:

"Any graph obtained       by replacing a blank node by a new blank 
node not in the original graph       is an instance of the original 
and       also has it as an instance, and this process can be 
iterated so that any       1:1 mapping between blank nodes defines an 
instance of a graph which has       the original graph as an 
instance. Two such graphs which       differ only in the identity of 
their blank nodes will often be treated       as indistinguishable."

Please reply to this email, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org indicating
whether this decision is acceptable.

Pat
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC					(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola              			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501           				(850)291 0667    cell
phayes@ai.uwf.edu	          http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
s.pam@ai.uwf.edu   for spam

Received on Monday, 21 April 2003 18:05:36 UTC