W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > April to June 2003

RE: Last Call comments on "Concepts and Abstract Syntax"

From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 15:19:25 +0100
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20030409151613.02d4e5d0@127.0.0.1>
To: "Williams, Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "'Jeremy Carroll'" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org

At 09:28 09/04/2003 +0100, Williams, Stuart wrote:
>I think that you are telling me that section 7 "Fragment Identifiers" is
>deemed informative ...

I think that is correct.

By my reading and intent, this section says nothing about the meaning of 
RDF that is not already covered by the formal semantics.  Rather, it 
explains and amplifies that that meaning is not in conflict with more 
conventional uses of fragment identifier in the web.

#g


-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>
PGP: 0FAA 69FF C083 000B A2E9  A131 01B9 1C7A DBCA CB5E
Received on Wednesday, 9 April 2003 13:05:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:32 GMT