W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > October to December 2002

RE: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions)

From: Danny Ayers <danny666@virgilio.it>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 16:22:20 +0100
To: "Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "www-rdf-comments" <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <EBEPLGMHCDOJJJPCFHEFCELIIJAA.danny666@virgilio.it>


>   <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.org/something#foo">
>
>RDF defines the URI to refer to whatever a document of type
>application/rdf-xml would define it to mean.  RDF defines that,
>irrespective of the mime-type of the document it is contained in.
>
>The point here is that there is no single mime-type for
>http://example.org/something.  In general, that URI does not denote a
>representation with a specific mime-type.
>
>Now lets consider a URI that does refer specifically to that
>representation:
>
>   <rdf:Description
>rdf:about="rep:text/html:http://example.org/something#foo">
>
>then the RDF denotation of that uriref is exactly the same as the html one.



Thanks, that's a lot clearer to me now.


Which only leaves: what is the relationship *in the graph* (if any) between
the resources referred to here? -

<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.org/something">
and
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.org/something#foo">
Received on Monday, 25 November 2002 10:37:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:31 GMT