Response not crossposted: At 10:06 25/11/2002 +0000, Dave Beckett wrote: [...] > > Does this mean that if I represent a graph in rdf/xml inside an html > > document by putting some triples inside rdf tags it has a completely > > different meaning to a graph expressed in exactly the same way but > served as > > an .rdf document? I said somthing like that once and Graham Klyne pointed out my error to me. If I have some HTML containing say: <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.org/something#foo"> ... The issue here is about what http://example.org/something#foo names. The meaning of this is not dependent on the mimetype of the referring document, e.g. text/html, but on the mime-type of the *retrieved* document. The RDF specs are saying that for determining the RDF meaning of this uriref, it is the meaning that would be assigned by retrieving a document of mime-type application/rdf+xml. Embedding in a document of mime-type text/html does not affect this. BrianReceived on Monday, 25 November 2002 06:08:37 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 18:22:15 GMT