W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > October to December 2002

Re: Comments on RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 19:02:04 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <20021121.190204.70982033.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Cc: phayes@ai.uwf.edu, www-rdf-comments@w3.org

With the indicate change, the caveat would help to reduce the potential for
problems.

peter


From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Subject: Re: Comments on RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 23:53:58 +0000

> Peter,
> 
> I believe I have now understood your concerns on equality ...
> 
> Would the following text near the beginning of the abstract syntax section 
> help (help enough to reduce it to a minor concern?)
> [[
> Note: Syntactic equality, between RDF graphs, URI references or literals, 
> is *ALWAYS* inappropriate for applications. Semantic notions, defined in 
> [RDF-SEMANTICS], such as that of entailment between graphs, or that of 
> having the same denotation are to be used instead.
> ]]
> 
> Jeremy
> 
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 21 November 2002 19:03:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:31 GMT