W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > October to December 2002

Re: reification in RDF

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 12:42:02 -0500 (EST)
To: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>
cc: "www-rdf-comments@w3.org" <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0211191240060.9155-100000@tux.w3.org>


I should clarify my comments. I was referring to RDF going *from the Primer*.

BTW pls don't use www-rdf-comments as a way of sending comments on RDF
Core discussions in progress. The www-rdf-interest list would be more
appropriate (or IRC), though its easy to take things out of context.
Feedback on the published TRs is very welcome here, though.

cheers,

Dan



On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Seth Russell wrote:

>
> re http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0446.html
>
> where Dan says
>
> [[
> I'd be happy to see reification go. Judging by RDF Interest Group
> discussions, once folk find out about RDF reification, they feel somehow
> obliged to try to use it for various modeling tasks that it isn't really
> appropriate/useful for.
> ]]
>
> How else are we to give our RDF statments provenance ?
>
> Seth Russell
>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 19 November 2002 12:42:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:31 GMT