Hi Jerome I am responding to parts of your message: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002JulSep/0164.html We have recently published a new version http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-concepts-20021108/ In this, we define an RDF graph as a set of triples, rather than as a variant on a graph, so: [[[ Also in 3.5 RDF graph, in the Note: - RDF Graphs are "node-labeled, edge-labeled directed multi-graphs" (with no disjointness constraints between node-labels and edge-labels): the multi- aspect is not in the note (i.e., that there can be several arcs between the two same nodes -- maybe with different labels). ]]] has gone. We look forward to any comments on the current draft. JeremyReceived on Monday, 18 November 2002 09:39:11 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:31 GMT