- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 18:06:02 +0000
- To: "Shelley Powers" <shelleyp@burningbird.net>, <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
- Cc: <danbri@w3.org>
At 11:10 14/11/2002 -0600, Shelley Powers wrote: [...] >That does help Brian. I'm not as concerned about editorial changes as I am >of document and specification architectural changes. For instance, >implementing separate semantic and concept documents rather than one model >theory document is an architectural change; tweaking the writing in the new >documents is purely editorial. > >Collection is an RDF architectural change; adding new examples of how >collections work to the documents is pure editorial. > >My concern is that I'm looking for the stick in the ground, that 'x' that >marks that spot, that says the group basically considers this the RDF >specification it's going forward with and outside of minor tweaks to the >documents, this is what the group will live with and anything new will have >to be resolved in future releases of the specifications. > >Can we consider this release of all of these documents to represent that >stick? Yes. However, I cannot promise that anything new will only be considered by a future WG. We have to respond to feedback on these documents, either now, at last call or even later. However, the WG is done with the technical issues; it will take new information to re-open them. Subject to some editorial polishing and perhaps some minor technical tweaks, this is the proposal the WG will be recommending to the membership. Brian
Received on Thursday, 14 November 2002 13:04:45 UTC