Daniel, I'll see what can be done to get these doc's updated. I need to check what w3c process allows us to do. Brian At 15:37 15/10/2002 -0400, Daniel \"eikeon\" Krech wrote: >I would like to follow up on: > >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2001OctDec/0336.html > > >Looking at: > http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/rdfs-namespace.xml (latest?) >the resolution has not yet been applied. > >It appears that the issue may be pending a response: >[[[ >Please could you respond to this message, copying >www-rdf-comments@w3.org, indicating whether this is an acceptable >resolution of the issue. >]]] > >If possible, I would like to indicate that the resolution is acceptable. >James and I noticed this issue when doing a schema driven editor and I >am noticing it again as I am working on more schema driven tools. > > >--eikeon, http://eikeon.com/Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2002 03:12:52 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 18:22:15 GMT