Re: rdf:nodeID addresses rdfms-syntax-incomplete

On 11 Oct 2002, Dan Connolly wrote:

>
> Brian,
>
> In #rdfig (just before
> http://ilrt.org/discovery/chatlogs/rdfig/2002-10-11#T16-04-29
> ) we discovered the RDF issues list doesn't
> say anything about rdf:nodeID.
>
> I found the WG decision, confirmed with Dave B,
> and updated the issues list, moving the
> issue from 'postponed' to 'attention developers'.
>
> revision 1.174
> date: 2002/10/11 16:03:17;  author: connolly;  state: Exp;  lines: +16
> -3
> updated issue syntax-incomplete w.r.t. 26 July decision
>
> Feel free to refine or back out the change if this
> isn't consistent with the way you maintain the
> issues list.
>
> Jan,
>
> Brian usually notifies the party that raised
> the issue, seeking confirmation. Perhaps
> this message will save him the trouble.
> Please let us (i.e. www-rdf-comments) know
> if this addresses the issue to your satisfaction.

It certainly does, thanks.


-- 
jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/
Q: What's yellow and equivalent to the axiom of choice? A: Zorn's lemon.