W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > October to December 2002

Re: rdf:nodeID addresses rdfms-syntax-incomplete

From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 17:13:53 +0100 (BST)
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, www-rdf-comments <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>, Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0210111713300.2755-100000@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>

On 11 Oct 2002, Dan Connolly wrote:

>
> Brian,
>
> In #rdfig (just before
> http://ilrt.org/discovery/chatlogs/rdfig/2002-10-11#T16-04-29
> ) we discovered the RDF issues list doesn't
> say anything about rdf:nodeID.
>
> I found the WG decision, confirmed with Dave B,
> and updated the issues list, moving the
> issue from 'postponed' to 'attention developers'.
>
> revision 1.174
> date: 2002/10/11 16:03:17;  author: connolly;  state: Exp;  lines: +16
> -3
> updated issue syntax-incomplete w.r.t. 26 July decision
>
> Feel free to refine or back out the change if this
> isn't consistent with the way you maintain the
> issues list.
>
> Jan,
>
> Brian usually notifies the party that raised
> the issue, seeking confirmation. Perhaps
> this message will save him the trouble.
> Please let us (i.e. www-rdf-comments) know
> if this addresses the issue to your satisfaction.

It certainly does, thanks.


-- 
jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/
Q: What's yellow and equivalent to the axiom of choice? A: Zorn's lemon.
Received on Friday, 11 October 2002 12:18:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:31 GMT